The Omnivore’s Hundred

2 November 2008, 12:25


  1. Copy this list into your blog or journal, including these instructions.
  2. Bold all the items you.ve eaten.
  3. Cross out any items that you would never consider eating (or eating again)
  4. Optional extra: Post a comment http://www.verygoodtaste.co.uk linking to your results.

To make the filling out of this form and generating the HTML for it a bit easier, [info]reddywhp has played around with some PHP. Go to http://reddywhip.org/lj/foods/ and fill it out there. After filling it out, you will be given the code to copy and paste into your blog.

Livejournal users, remember to use your LJ-Cuts!

  1. Venison
  2. Nettle tea
  3. Huevos rancheros
  4. Steak tartare
  5. Crocodile
  6. Black pudding
  7. Cheese fondue
  8. Carp
  9. Borscht
  10. Baba ghanoush
  11. Calamari
  12. Pho
  13. PB&J sandwich
  14. Aloo gobi
  15. Hot dog from a street cart
  16. Epoisses
  17. Black truffle
  18. Fruit wine made from something other than grapes
  19. Steamed pork buns
  20. Pistachio ice cream
  21. Heirloom tomatoes
  22. Fresh wild berries
  23. Foie gras
  24. Rice and beans
  25. Brawn, or head cheese
  26. Raw Scotch Bonnet pepper
  27. Dulce de leche
  28. Oysters
  29. Baklava
  30. Bagna cauda
  31. Wasabi peas
  32. Clam chowder in a sourdough bowl
  33. Salted lassi
  34. Sauerkraut
  35. Root beer float
  36. Cognac with a fat cigar
  37. Clotted cream tea
  38. Vodka jelly
  39. Gumbo
  40. Oxtail
  41. Curried goat
  42. Whole insects
  43. Phaal
  44. Goat’s milk
  45. Malt whisky from a bottle worth $120 or more
  46. Fugu
  47. Chicken tikka masala
  48. Eel
  49. Krispy Kreme original glazed doughnut
  50. Sea urchin
  51. Prickly pear
  52. Umeboshi
  53. Abalone
  54. Paneer
  55. McDonald’s Big Mac Meal
  56. Spaetzle
  57. Dirty gin martini
  58. Beer above 8% ABV
  59. Poutine
  60. Carob chips
  61. S’mores
  62. Sweetbreads
  63. Kaolin
  64. Currywurst
  65. Durian
  66. Frog’s Legs
  67. Beignets, churros, elephant ears or funnel cake
  68. Haggis
  69. Fried plantain
  70. Chitterlings or andouillette
  71. Gazpacho
  72. Caviar and blini
  73. Louche absinthe
  74. Gjetost or brunost
  75. Roadkill
  76. Baijiu
  77. Hostess Fruit Pie
  78. Snail
  79. Lapsang souchong
  80. Bellini
  81. Tom yum
  82. Eggs Benedict
  83. Pocky
  84. Tasting menu at a three-Michelin-star restaurant
  85. Kobe beef
  86. Hare
  87. Goulash
  88. Flowers
  89. Horse
  90. Criollo chocolate
  91. Spam
  92. Soft shell crab
  93. Rose harissa
  94. Catfish
  95. Mole poblano
  96. Bagel and lox
  97. Lobster Thermidor
  98. Polenta
  99. Jamaican Blue Mountain coffee
  100. Snake


Leave comments here...

···

Textpattern - again

8 October 2008, 06:08

So, I have been doing some design work lately. I just got asked to design a new site that is using Wordpress. It has been a while since I had to look at other CMS’s or Blogging packages.



Having done a few, four to be exact, sites with Textpattern … I really do like it and as someone said, “it is what we feel comfortable using” … Here, here.



TXP carver
To the carver of letters in stone

A few links to Textpattern resources; Utter Plush, Wilshire One, Threshold State, Iaian7, and The Bombsite. These sites all have links to more resources, so give Textpattern a test drive if you need this sort of software to run your website.



And not to forget, though not much about Textpattern, the inventor of Textpattern himself … Dean Allen, writing it like it is.



Tag … You’re it!


Leave comments here...

···

50

27 July 2008, 12:28


50

Leave comments here...

···

OH Canada Day ... Eh!!!

1 July 2008, 20:41


1st July 2008 and Canada is 141 years old and our $ is better than the Greenback. So here is to the best place in the world to live, even if we have to deal with provincial bickering. The sun is setting and soon the fireworks begin.



Waiting for the Fireworks
Emily & me … showing our patriotism

Leave comments here...

···

Word of the Day

29 June 2008, 06:37

Nescient (adjective)



Pronunciation: [‘ne-shent, ‘ne-si-yênt]



Definition: (1) Ignorant, lacking knowledge; (2) agnostic, believing that man is incapable of understanding the nature of the universe.



Usage: “Nescient” has few relatives. The noun from it is “nescience” while “nesciently” is the adverb. It has a cousin, “nescious,” with the same meaning, which is related to “nice” (see Etymology). It is distantly related to nescio “a claim of ignorance, of not knowning,” from the Latin word nescio “I don’t know.” This word is a useful noun for our times: “US courtrooms today resound with the nescios of corporate executives squirming on the witness stand.”



Suggested Usage: Occasionally you may wish to speak your mind without wanting it to be understood. “I think your comment reflects a profound nescience of the problem, Slobodan,” might even get you a nod of gratitude from the target of your insult. Places do exist, by the way, where nescience is not at all out of place, “Mr. Chips’s heart tightened ever so slightly before yet another sea of nescient freshman faces in the auditorium.”



Etymology: Today’s word is a borrowing from Latin “nesciens,” the present participle of nescire “to be ignorant,” derived from ne- “not” + scire “to know.” The Latin word belonged to a family that included “nescius,” borrowed into English as nescious (see Usage). In Old French, the same word was reduced to “nise” and was borrowed into Old English as “nice,” meaning “foolish, silly,” a meaning that inexplicably migrated to what it is today.



–Dr. Language, YourDictionary.com


Leave comments here...

···

IE8 & Version Targeting

31 January 2008, 21:06

It all began, well I read it there first, on A List Apart – No.#251



# 251

The following is from the Zeldman himself … Jeffrey Zeldman said on January 23rd, 2008 at 7:02 am:



No less an authority than PPK will be writing about the consequences for DOM scripting in an upcoming issue of A List Apart.



The onus should be on the people who are doing things the ‘wrong’ way to take that extra step



But many won’t; for them, IE7 behavior makes sense as a default (since they did at least test in IE7).



I co-founded and for several key years led the group that got standards in our browsers and persuaded designers to learn to use them.



I publish the magazine that has long championed standards-based development.



I wrote the book that created standards-based design as a category, shaking up publishing as well as web development.



I’m well aware that it will be a better world when every developer creates semantic, accessible websites. I’ve written and published and lectured all over to try to bring about that outcome.



I also know that we’re not there yet.



And sites “breaking” (suddenly no longer displaying or behaving correctly with the introduction of a new browser) won’t magically get us there. Whether Microsoft follows through on version targeting or not is irrelevant to the goal of educating web developers about standards. A “broken” site won’t lead masses of developers to become educated about standards. That argument – that the default should be to break the site – doesn’t hold up, because it assumes that developers will do the right thing.



Many just won’t.



This doesn’t mean we stop putting educational materials out there. It doesn’t mean we stop trying to persuade our colleagues that standards and accessibility are in their interest.



It means we don’t ignore the fact of widespread developer ignorance of standards-based design.



It means, if the default Microsoft proposes helps mitigate the negative effects of widespread developer ignorance of standards-based design, we at least consider the possibility that Microsoft may know more about standards-unaware developers than we do, and they may have a point.



Developers who want the default behavior to be latest can opt in via “edge.”



The scenario Microsoft seems to have had in mind is more probable than the one Jeremy Keith raises. That a developer will want IE8 to behave like Firefox, Opera, and Safari where generated content is concerned, but won’t know to write the meta element that IE8 requires to behave like IE8, is far less likely than the scenario of the standards-ignorant developer not knowing or caring about any of this, and being shocked when his site goes blooey in IE8.



Statistically alone, it makes more sense to protect the ignorant (and their clients) from themselves and to ask the educated to do a little extra than to expect the ignorant, who already don’t do enough, to magically gain knowledge and skill and do more.


Leave comments here...

···

Bye Bye Minou

24 January 2008, 17:44

Do I say happy birthday … she would have been 44 today … you are a great spirit guide … let the journey continue … bye Judith



To LIFE ... merci Minou

Tag I am it … for now …


Leave comments here...

···

Previous Next

TAG you're IT!